Tag Archives: Benefits

Open Source Storage: 6 Benefits

Storage software creation, delivery, and support are all evolving at a high rate today. We’ve added open source coding, support-services bundling, platform pre-integration, code as a service, microservice architectures, and scalable  software-defined storage services to the traditional bundled proprietary code approach. Open source packages in the storage word are now mainstream solutions.

The acceptance of open source storage is no accident. The leaders in the space, such as Ceph and Gluster, are all characterized by large communities, well-organized communications between developers, liaison with the customer base, and the support of a commercial vendor delivering full technical support and, typically, for-profit enterprise editions with additional features. These open source storage products compete with for-profit code and maintain leadership in most areas other than prices.

Apart from the leading packages, we see many other examples of open source storage code arising from communities of interest, such as the Btrfs and OpenZFS file systems, the LizardFS and Lustre distributed file systems, and Pydio, a file sharing system. , These projects vary in fullness of feature set and code quality, so that in their early stages it is definitely buyer beware. These packages, however, are a rich source of innovation for the storage industry and some will likely grow beyond their niche status in a couple of years, so it is impossible to dismiss them out of hand.

The community nature of open source means several things. First, it makes niche solutions easier to obtain since the community pre-defines a receptive customer base and a roadmap of needs. Compare this with the traditional startup – raising funds, defining an abstract product, developing it, and then finding customers. Community-based solutions lead to much more innovation. Often, solutions serving your specific needs are available, though a thorough evaluation is needed to offset risk.

In and of itself, open source storage code would not be interesting without the availability of commodity  hardware platforms that are much cheaper than gear from major league traditional vendors. It’s relatively easy to integrate open-source code onto these low-cost, highly standardized platforms. Generally, the standardization inherent in commodity hardware makes most open source code plug-and-play, irrespective of the hardware configuration.

In this slideshow, I delve into six open source storage benefits, and why you should consider open source storage for your data center.

(Image: Camm Productions/Shutterstock)

Source link

Hyperconvergence Benefits Come With Challenges

Enterprises are adopting hyperconverged systems at a rapid clip to reduce costs and overcome the complexity of traditional storage infrastructure. However, as companies reap hyperconvergence benefits, deploying the technology isn’t exactly a cake walk.

Those are the top findings of a new report from Technology Business Research, a market research and consulting firm. TBR analysts surveyed 202 enterprise IT and business leaders and also conducted a dozen in-depth interviews to gauge the state of the hyperconvergence market and customers’ experience with the technology.

TBR estimates the market for hyperconverged platforms will grow at a 53% CAGR between 2015 and 2020, reaching $7.2 billion. “We expect that this investment will increasingly come at the expense of legacy infrastructure,” Krista Macomber, TBR senior analyst, told me in an interview.

TBR defines hyperconverged platforms as combining a storage controller, array and applications on one server; other attributes can include a building-block architecture using commodity hardware and the unification of enterprise storage and virtual machines.

The need to reduce costs and streamline IT operations is a top driver for enterprise adoption of hyperconvergence, Macomber said: “They’re looking to hyperconverged platforms to reduce the inefficiencies of legacy storage environments.” At the same time, companies are experiencing business benefits that go beyond cost reduction. For example, some companies told TBR hyperconvergence made it possible for them to implement a disaster recovery program.

According to TBR’s research, the first workloads companies target for hyperconverged platforms are data-centric, focused on operations like analytics and backup and recovery, as they aim to shift away from expensive and cumbersome legacy SAN systems. But enterprises are increasingly interested in deploying more business-centric workloads, such as ERP, on the systems.

Hyperconvergence pain points

Despite the benefits, customers are experiencing some pain points in their hyperconverged deployments, TBR found.

“Customers are realizing there’s more to the cost equation than up-front costs,” Macomber said. “New architectures like hyperconverged platforms change not only their data center architecture, but also the way the IT staff operates.”

In fact, internal resistance to change was the top challenge associated with hyperconvergence cited by survey respondents. The IT team needs to understand how the technology — as it seeks to eliminate silos between compute, storage, and networking — will mean a shift in some IT roles to more of an IT generalist, she said.

“IT is still sorting out how it will operate and shift to a more generalist approach,” Macomber said, adding that the shift doesn’t necessarily diminish the IT team’s position in the organization. “In fact, it can make it more strategic,” she said. “But there’s definitely a change in mindset and culture that needs to happen.”

Interestingly, even though the hyperconvergence market is growing fast, TBR’s study found that almost 40% of enterprises that have adopted the technology are unsure if they will made additional investments in hyperconverged products. The finding indicates that vendors aren’t effectively addressing customer requirements around fast and simple time to deployment, cost-effectiveness, and scalability, according to Macomber.

Scalability has been cited by others as an area where hyperconverged systems are limited.

Vendor landscape

The hyperconverged infrastructure market is a fairly crowded one with established vendors competing against pure-play startups such as Nutanix and SimpliVity. Macomber doesn’t expect the crowded landscape to change too much over the next year.

Integration of the Dell and EMC hyperconvergence portfolios, along with its impact on Dell vendor partnerships, will take time, she said. The pure-play companies are focused on maximizing their installed base while other multi-platform vendors like Cisco and Hewlett-Packard Enterprise are investing in developing their hyperconvergence lines.

Long term, there will be market consolidation, but right now, “it’s still fairly early days” for hyperconvergence, Macomber said.

Hear more about hyperconverged infrastructure from Krista Macomber live and in person at Interop ITX, where she will present “Converged and Hyperconverged Infrastructure: Myths & Truths.” Register now for Interop ITX, May 15-19 in Las Vegas.

Source link